And dating daan doctrines covenants

and dating daan doctrines covenants

The Ang Dating Daan is one such religious organization. . This teaching and belief of the ADD/MCGI that Soriano is God's Mouth piece. In several ways, Ang Dating Daan (ADD) is like any other Christian church. We are not teaching anything which is not taught by the Bible. Among the cultic teachings you will find in Ang Dating Daan include: Jesus has no human nature, Trinity, Incarnation and such other basic.
  • Restoring the Supremacy & Sovereignty of Jesus Christ in Three Angel's Messages
  • Navigation menu

and dating daan doctrines covenants

However, this meaning cannot be imposed in the context of John The church believes that Jesus Christ will reign with his saints for another one thousand 1, years citing Rev Additionally, in this case, St.

and dating daan doctrines covenants

And dating daan doctrines covenants -

The Father never existed without the Son and the Holy Spirit. This is correct, though unfortunately as noted above he concludes that because the Son and the Holy Spirit receive their being from the Father they must be less than Him. Soriano also tends toward the error of tritheism that there are three gods , as he denies that the three persons of the Godhead are one in all their works in creation in the language of theology, their operations ad extra.

More on this below. He thus revives the ancient heresy of Apollinarianism. Next, his belief that the persons of the Godhead are not one in all their works leads him to a rather bizarre doctrine of salvation. And finally, as a result of his incompetence to interpret Scripture, demonstrated above, Soriano misunderstands the attributes of God, and denies such a fundamental doctrine as His omnipresence.

Let us then test the spirits to see whether they are from God 1 John 4: In any case, Soriano understands the word Godhead in the same sense it is commonly used in theology, that is, to denote the union of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, the three divine persons taken together. This is clear from his affirmations that there are three persons in the Godhead.

Now, as noted above, Godhead is used three times in KJV. The context says nothing about multiple persons or entities; in fact, St. Next, in Romans 1: Again, the context contains nothing about multiple persons; it is about the divine attributes knowable by reason alone.

Finally, in Colossians 2: However, the meaning of the Greek is that the fullness of the essence of the divinity dwells in Christ, that is, that the Son is fully God, participates fully in the divine nature of the Father, and is therefore co-equal with Him. In this context, theotetos denotes the divine essence, not the persons of the Godhead.

So, Soriano is once again hoisted by his own petard. If the word Trinity is never used in the Bible, neither is the word Godhead, at least in the sense Soriano takes it to mean. But this is not a battle of semantics anyway. What matters is not whether we can find the word Trinity in the Bible, but whether the concept is there. First, that the Father and Son are co-equal is taught in John 5: Behold, the Jews understand what the Arians do not understand.

The Arians, in fact, say that the Son is not equal with the Father, and hence it is that the heresy was driven from the Church. Lo, the very blind, the very slayers of Christ, still understood the words of Christ. All the fullness Gk. Moving on, we see the same doctrine once again in Philippians 2: Now, we have two possibilities for the correct interpretation of this verse: The Catholic Church holds the former, whereas the Arians, and most likely Soriano following them, hold the latter.

So, many of the arguments that the Holy Fathers adduced against the Arian position might be applied to Soriano as well. In this vein, St. In the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established. But it is also wise and sane to be sure that your church or your faith is the true church and faith based on Scriptural truths. I hereunder copy what you said: If this does not mean that you are judging all churches outside of your alleged true church, is this camouflaged hypocrisy?

Logic dictates that where there are no means of salvation, there is no salvation; and that is precisely what is meant by RCC authorities. Casilly page this see image below. You said that my post was wasted. I am sorry you judged it hastily. It would have been better if you asked me if I have further proof to substantiate what I have written. You also said that it is a topic irrelevant to the document at hand, but in searching for the truth, you have to consider present and previous claims and teachings made by the Roman Catholic Church.

It is just like taking something out from the whole context of a book or a set of teachings and not taking it out of context. They must be taken in context for the entire truth to be known. Hereunder, is a part of the question raised at the Second Vatican Council, and the corresponding response: It is possible, according to Catholic doctrine, to affirm correctly that the Church of Christ is present and operative in the churches and ecclesial Communities not yet fully in communion with the Catholic Church, on account of the elements of sanctification and truth that are present in them.

Thousands upon thousands of people gathered in front of the Human Rights Commission in the Philippines to show their support to Brother Eli when the latter was indefinitely suspended by the MTRCB to appear in any television program.

I believe this prohibition is against our constitution and the jurisprudence and doctrines being upheld by the Supreme Court of the Republic of the Philippines.

See Reference Below The bedrock of freedom of religion is freedom of thought and it is best served by encouraging the marketplace of dueling ideas. When the luxury of time permits, the marketplace of ideas demands that speech should be met by more speech for it is the spark of opposite speech, the heat of colliding ideas that can fan the embers of truth. For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.

I visited your blogsite and I appreciate your effort in trying to expose also, the deceit being employed by religious leaders in your country. RSV These are the common denominators among false prophets: And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you… Nowhere in the books of the Old Testament, neither in the New Testament can anybody find that the meaning of prosperity is material wealth as these pastors of doom preach.

These words were translated in the English Bible as prosperity and to prosper respectively. They do not necessarily imply material wealth as these pastors and false prophets claim. In the first century Christian Church, there were members whom we can consider as the poorest of the poor. They are not materially wealthy, but are active members of the Church.